|
|
||||
|
ISSN 1108-8931 |
INTERNATIONAL ECOTOURISM MONTHLY |
Year 4, Issue 47, Apr. 2003 |
||
|
The ECOCLUB
Interview Edward Cameron
|
||||
|
When defining terms such as environmental governance it is very easy to slip into jargon and/ or vague definitions. I prefer to avoid these and so I would simply say that governance is the process whereby we seek to improve public policy. There are a number of key deficiencies in public policy at the moment. Chief among these are the failure to properly involve diverse interests in the preparation of policy, a failure to consider the wider impact of public policy, a failure to implement policy once made, and a failure to properly engage the general public. Governance offers us an opportunity to address these deficiencies by developing tools for greater consultation, participation, and communication. In the environment field governance will mean providing stakeholders with a greater opportunity to participate in the preparation of policy. This will involve setting up consultation mechanisms and providing greater access to information and decision-making. It will also require more transparency and accountability to enable closer scrutiny of how decisions are made. It will require an improved communication system that educates, mobilises, and responds to the general public. This inevitably will spark a movement away from traditional forms of information provision towards more innovative and interactive forms. It will also demand that we pay more attention to policy integration. At present there are confusing messages emanating from the European Union on transport, energy, and agriculture. While one department provides subsidies to fossil fuels, another tries in vain to promote renewable energies. This confusion needs to be replaced by greater coherence. Of course this process of improving environmental policy is not limited to the European level. It is a process that will need to progress at the national, regional, and local as well. The aim is to ensure greater implementation of laws by making better laws.
To my knowledge there is no definitive criteria or definition for ecotourism at the European level and this is indeed a problem. Some see ecotourism as a new tourism market, an economic boon to go along side mass tourism, second home tourism, classical tourism, and sun/ sea tourism. I am personally troubled by this as for me ecotourism should not be a new market but rather a principal that is applied across tourism markets. My hope is that the conference in Volos will assist in the development of clear and coherent criteria.
In my view there is no single "attitude" to sustainable tourism within local and regional authorities. The attitude depends on so many variables ranging from culture to economic context, and from political climate to personalities. Some municipalities, notably Calvia in Spain recognised long ago that sustainable development was an essential part of their tourism product. They realised that tourists are looking for quality of life just as much as the local inhabitants are and so they made a conscious effort to protect their cultural and environmental heritage. Other municipalities have regrettably opted for the easy money that mass tourism offers. This short-sighted view is already posing problems throughout the Mediterranean. A third type of municipality markets ecotourism without actually doing anything to promote a sustainable vision of the tourism market. So I think much work needs to be done and in this respect there is a key role for NGOs in publicising poor practice, for consumers in demanding a better tourism product, for business in adopting a long term approach to their product, and for local authorities to provide the framework where all of this can happen. This framework is what we call governance.
This is a difficult question to answer and I am not sure that I am qualified to make judgements here. However my gut feeling tells me that the situation in Iraq will hit tourism revenues and probably hit them very hard. This may have a severe impact in Turkey in particular. My fear is that this will encourage a panicked response leading to neglect for environmental issues as hard hit destinations chase the remaining revenue.
I think this is a very important issue. Transparency is not just about targeting corruption. Even when money is spent honestly it is often spent inefficiently. At the moment too few people are involved in deciding on where and how money is spent. This needs to change.
Environmental governance can tackle this issue by providing better information to the consumers not only on the environmental impact but also and crucially on the alternatives. Environmental communication tends to focus too much on the problems and not enough on the solutions.
Environmental governance in Eastern Europe faces a number of problems. The first problem is a failure of co-operation. This is characterised by a lack of co-operation between different municipalities and also a breakdown in co-ordination within the various municipal departments. The second problem involves a failure of communication: the inability of many municipalities to properly dialogue with and relate to their own communities. This second problem is characterised by poor environmental communication, insufficient public participation, and low levels of stakeholder dialogue. Both of these fundamental problems represent critical shortcomings in urban governance and significant barriers inhibiting the sustainable management of cities and towns. The region typically lacks a vision for environmental governance whereby stakeholders collaborate to address problems. This can be partly attributed to 50 years of Soviet rule in the CEEC. Co-operation in the modern sense of the word was virtually non-existent during those years. Instead authorities were characteristically suspicious and guarded information rather than sharing it. In order to implement good governance, sustainable urban development, and European Environmental Legislation, it is critical that these fundamental problems are addressed.
I don't have much to add here because I absolutely agree. I myself come from a poor urban area and I often tire of explaining to "Middle Class" children why it is that so many of our deprived urban and rural areas suffer from environmental problems. When growing up in my home town you worried about getting a job and earning some money first, paying your bills and providing for your family second, and environment some where a long way down the line. It is difficult to protect the environment when 25% of the population is unemployed. It is difficult to persuade someone with no job and no hope for a job that he should recycle. That is why we need to promote environmental protection as a "quality of life" package that includes economic development.
The main challenge is to change behaviour. Over the past ten years we have been successful at raising awareness but the time for that has passed. We now need to change behaviour by providing solutions and so mobilising the general public. In terms of themes I think waste management and noise will be crucial as these are the issues of prime concern to the European public
I would like to draw your readers attention to a study on environmental communication that I have just prepared for the European Commission. This can be downloaded from http://www.cameronsds.com/portfolio/current/env_com/ I hope your readers will comment on this and also that they will build on some of the good practice contained within the report. For more details on the Environmental Governance
Conference in Volos, please see:
|
||||
|
Home|Ecolodges|News|Shop|Community|Chat|Library|Events|Advertise|Join|Recommend |
||||
|
Copyright © 1999-2003 ECOCLUB S.A. All Rights Reserved. |
||||